Vertical Jump Con Artists, Part 2
This is a follow up to the article I wrote about Vertical Jump Con Artists. I
felt the need to add a Part II because the original article initiated a whirlwind
of responses and comments, nearly every one of which was overwhelmingly positive
and supportive. However, I did receive a small handful of comments from folks
that disagreed with my position. I view that as a good thing! I never
have had a problem with folks who take a different stance and have different opinions
from my own. I welcome it and respect it. That is what makes life fun. I have
always enjoyed a good debate, especially when it comes to proper training and performance
enhancement, because I am so passionate about the topic. I have numerous colleagues
and friends in the industry, some in the private sector, some in the NCAA, and some
in the NBA… and we all have slightly different philosophies and methodologies. I
respect any strength & conditioning coach who is passionate, energetic, truly
cares about the well being of their players, and can rationalize their training
philosophy; regardless if it differs from mine. I know, and wholeheartedly
believe, there are numerous programs that “work.”
With that being said, if you are going to initiate a debate with my philosophy,
please do so under the following two conditions:
- Be respectful and professional. I had someone leave a comment that was not
only factually incorrect (it was as if he didn't even read my blog); it was full
of grammatical errors, expletive words, and was more of a personal attack on me.
If you want respect, you have to earn it. You only earn it by carrying yourself
in a professional manner and sticking to the issue at hand. You if you want to debate
philosophies; awesome! If you want to talk smack; look elsewhere.
- Have something legitimate to back up your point of view; either personal experience
with the players you work with or unbiased research. Don't come at me with hear-say
and propaganda from folks who have an obvious financial interest. And please get
your own facts straight before you try to argue against mine!
Now, there most certainly was real validity to the responses and comments who disagreed
with my article. They were comments and responses I have heard many times
before, so I felt compelled to address them in this post. I am going to paraphrase
some of the most common comments and give my two cents on each. Please note,
these questions are an amalgam of the comments I routinely get - these are
not from any particular individual per se but rather more of a summary.
Comment: Do you really believe
genetics play a role in your vertical jump?
[Alan Stein] Absolutely; 100%. Genetics are the #1
determining factor in a person's potential to jump. I challenge you to find
ONE legitimate strength & conditioning coach, physical therapist, or athletic
trainer who believes genetics do NOT play a significant role in one's vertical jump
potential. Now, this by no means implies that someone with a high vertical jump
doesn't work hard or train properly; it just means they were born with the genetic
predisposition to achieve such results. It also doesn't mean someone with
less than ideal genetics can't make progress; they most certainly can! Everyone
can improve their vertical jump and maximize their potential; but not everyone can
have a 40” vertical or dunk a basketball.
Comment: How do genetics have
anything to do with it?
[Alan Stein] For one, your genetics determine your
muscle fiber type. This is a key factor. Someone who possesses predominantly
fast twitch muscle fibers in their lower body has the potential to jump higher than
someone who was born with mostly slow twitch fibers. While your central nervous
system's efficiency can be improved through proper training; your overall neurological
efficiency is somewhat pre-determined at birth. Some folks were just born
with more control over their muscular system. Limb length and tendon insertion
points are two other genetic factors you can't control. The folks with the
highest vertical jumps were born with favorable genetics and have trained hard and
trained properly.
Comment: If you don't think a
50” vertical is possible, how do you explain all of the guys on YouTube like Area
51 (he is only 5' 7”) and the guys on Team Flight Brothers?
[Alan Stein] First and foremost, I never once said
that it was impossible to have a 50” vertical. I am saying it is extremely rare;
like “winning the lottery” rare. I know these guys have impressive leaping
ability… I have seen it firsthand. I also know they work hard on their craft and
train consistently. But if you believe for one second these particular individuals
weren't born with the favorable genetic predispositions (muscle fiber type, CNS
efficiency, etc.) that gave them the potential to jump that high; then you need
to re-read my previous answer regarding genetics. That is exactly why everyone
who does a vertical jump training program can't jump as high as these guys.
Do you think if you followed their EXACT training program for an entire year you
would have the same result? Do you think you would have a 50” vertical?
Comment: Why do you NFL players
and Olympic lifters have higher verticals then NBA players?
[Alan Stein] I am well aware that the highest combine
verticals for certain NFL positions (cornerbacks, running backs, and wide receivers)
are statistically higher than the average combine verticals for potential NBA players.
No argument. I assume the same is true for elite Olympic lifters; although I haven't
seen the stats. The elite level football players at those three positions in particular,
almost all of the time, were born with the same genetic advantages I keep mentioning.
A prototypical cornerback in the NFL is EXTREMELY explosive. He has to be, or he
wouldn't be playing at that level! Again, that doesn't mean he hasn't worked
hard and trained properly, it means he was born with certain tools that allowed
him to develop such explosiveness through training. Not everyone was born with the
tools to be an NFL cornerback; just as not everyone was born with the tools to dunk
a basketball or play in the NBA. Bottom line is this; in order to be a successful
cornerback in the NFL or to be an Olympic caliber weight lifter, it is favorable
to be extremely explosive and powerful. Both require very short bursts of
high intensity power. There are always exceptions; but this is the general rule.
Comment: I think with hard work
an average person can beat someone with genetic talent.
[Alan Stein] Beat them in what? A vertical jump contest
or playing elite level basketball? If you are talking about basketball, there
are too many factors above and beyond vertical jump that determine a person's chances
of playing college or professional basketball. Fundamental skills, basketball IQ,
experience, height, and competitiveness are just some of the factors that are equally,
if not more, important than jumping ability. In this scenario I am well aware that
“hard work beats talent when talent fails to work hard.” That is one of my favorite
quotes. Yes, someone without superior genetics can still attain a high level
of success in a given sport. Yes, someone born with the right tools is not
guaranteed to be successful. I have never implied otherwise. But if you think
EVERYONE has the potential to have a 40” vertical jump or can dunk a basketball
than you are truly mistaken. This is why I wrote my original blog. Most (not
all) vertical jump programs claim that “anyone” can gain “8-12 inches” on their
vertical, which by my definition, would be “amazing results.” And again, I
know for a fact, that is 100% not true.
Train hard. Train smart.
Alan Stein
Part 1